論文 - 三品　英憲

「戦後国共内戦の帰結と中国共産党の建国・政権構想」

三品英憲

『和歌山大学教育学部紀要－人文科学－』   74   9 - 20   2024年02月  [査読有り]

DOI

「1947年における華北土地改革の急進化と劉少奇」

三品英憲

『和歌山大学教育学部紀要－人文科学－』   第70集   19 - 28   2020年02月

「1940年代後半における中国共産党各級組織の華北農村社会認識について－土地改革と社会構成－」

三品英憲

『和歌山大学教育学部紀要－人文科学－』   第69集   15 - 24   2018年02月

「関於20世紀40年代各級党組織対華北農村社会的認識ー通過台湾法務部調査局資料室所蔵資料来考察華北各辺区的認識為中心ー」

三品英憲

中国社会科学院近代史研究所・南開大学歴史学院・邯鄲学院『太行山文書与晋冀魯豫抗日根拠地国際学術検討会論文集』     150 - 157   2015年07月

「現代中国における党－国制の認識的前提について－汪暉の議論を素材として－」

三品英憲

孫文研究（孫文研究会） ( 孫文研究会 )  52号 ( 52 ) 22 - 34   2013年10月  [査読有り]

「毛沢東期の中国における支配の正当性論理と社会」

三品英憲

『歴史評論』（歴史科学協議会） ( 校倉書房 )  746号 ( 746 ) 76 - 91   2012年06月

「党・国家体制と中国の社会構造」

三品英憲

『新しい歴史学のために』 ( 京都民科歴史部会 )  278号 ( 278 ) 37 - 48   2011年05月

「1940年代における中国共産党と社会－『大衆路線』の浸透をめぐって－」

三品英憲

『歴史科学』（大阪歴史科学協議会）   203号   34 - 50   2011年02月

「近代華北村落における社会秩序と面子－『中国農村慣行調査』の分析を通して－」

三品英憲

『歴史学研究』（歴史学研究会） ( 青木書店 )  870号 ( 870 ) 1 - 19、61   2010年09月  [査読有り]

「中国共産党の支配の正当性論理と毛沢東」

三品英憲

『現代中国』（日本現代中国学会） ( 日本現代中国学会 )  84号 ( 84 ) 63 - 76   2010年09月  [査読有り]

「日本有関“社会主義中国”的歴史研究簡介」

三品英憲

『史林』（上海社会科学院歴史研究所）   2009年6期(総116期)   171 - 180   2009年12月  [査読有り]

「国共内戦の全面化と中国共産党－再考・1946年」

三品英憲

『史学研究』（広島史学会） ( 広島史学研究会 )  251号 ( 251 ) 27 - 47   2006年03月  [査読有り]

「『社会主義中国』研究と現代中国」

三品英憲

『歴史評論』（歴史科学協議会） ( 校倉書房 )  667号 ( 667 ) 51 - 64   2005年11月

「1930年代前半の中国農村における経済建設－中華平民教育促進会の『定県実験』をめぐって」

三品英憲

『アジア研究』（アジア政経学会） ( アジア政経学会 )  50巻2号 ( 2 ) 89 - 106   2004年04月  [査読有り]

「戦後内戦期における中国共産党の革命工作と華北農村社会－五四指示の再検討」

三品英憲

『史学雑誌』（史学会）   112編12号   61 - 84   2003年12月  [査読有り]

「近現代華北農村社会史研究についての覚書」

三品英憲

『史潮』（歴史学会） ( 弘文堂 )  新54号 ( 54 ) 27 - 46   2003年11月  [査読有り]

戦後内戦期における中国共産党の革命工作と華北農村社会 : 五四指示の再検討

三品 英憲

史学雑誌 ( 公益財団法人 史学会 )  112 ( 12 ) 1959 - 1982   2003年

　概要を見る

There have been many studies of the rural uprisings that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) carried out during the Civil War period.Previous Studies have considered this period of the revolution from a variety of viewpoints,but little attention has been paid to the consequences of socio-economic conditions particular to rural north China during that period.This article seeks to further our understanding of he history of the Chinese Revolution by examining the relationsho between socio-economic conditions and CCP revolutionary polities.After the end of the Sino-Japanese war,the CCP adopted a combination of the anti-traitor movement and the rent & interest reduction movement,constituting a two-pronged approach to the expansion and consolidation of the liberated areas.Owing to their long experience under the Japanese occupation,peasants participated enthusiastically in the anti-traitor movement.On the other hand,the rent & interest reduction movement fell short of CCP expectations,because there were few landlords and few tenants on the north China plain,and landlord-tenant conflict was minimal.The leaders of CCP thought that the rent & interest reduction movement was more important than the anti-traitor movement,since the former was a class-struggle that could liberate peasants,while the latter was not.The CCP leadership thought that the peasants themselves naturally had a "fighting spirit",and blamed the failure of the rent & interest reduction movement on their own rural cadres.As a result,these cadres becames subject to intense psychological pressure,and in some cases disciplinary action.Under these circumstances,the CCP's tural cadres in early 1946 adopted a new understanding of the rural revolition.They regarded traitors as feudal lords,and interpreted the anti-traitor movement as an anti-feudal struggle.This new understanding deviated from the CCP's original theory of revolution,but resulted in a substantial increase in "the anti-feudal struggle"repoted.Faced with this situation,the leaders approved this new understanding as an official understanding of the rural revolution,and issued the May Fourth Directive.

DOI

「近代中国農村における零細兼業農家の展開－河北省定県の地域経済構造分析を通して」

三品英憲

『土地制度史学』（土地制度史学会） ( 政治経済学・経済史学会 )  170号 ( 2 ) 18 - 35   2001年01月  [査読有り]

　概要を見る

The peasant smallholder, supplementing his income with a side job, has been a characteristic feature of modern rural China. Such peasants have variously been described as typifying "retrogression", "stagnation", or "development" in the framework of the "differentiation of peasantry" model. Today, however, that model is subject to serious doubt. The purpose of this paper is to examine transitions in the Chinese peasantry through a factual area study, focusing on the notion of the peasant smallholder with a side job as a representation of an economic condition of a Chinese peasant. The paper looks at Ding county (定県), Hebei province CRAM, in the early 1930s. At the time, the population of this region was engaged in diverse farming activities, largely determined by the various types of soil in Ding county. Peasants generally practiced single cropping of minor grains and raw cotton while three crops of major grains were taken over a two-year cycle. These cropping systems were accompanied by two types of cotton production : for domestic use in "grain areas", and for sale in "cotton areas". For the former, cotton handicrafts were a relatively unimportant element in the household economy, but for the latter, they were essential. In each household economy, we can witness a visible tendency toward diminution of the acreage devoted to cotton cultivation, in tandem with the commercialization of cotton handicrafts. However, we cannot accept the widely held explanation of the reduction of per-capita cultivated acreage as a simple outcome of population increase. A fuller explanation must take into consideration the peculiarity of commercialized cotton handicrafts, which depended heavily on soil type, and also on cotton-cropping practices and the mode of employment of the male labor force. Thus our investigation draws us to a recognition of the significance of prevalent conditions in each area. This approach will lead us to a view that sees the integration of the peasant economy into commercialized cotton handicrafts as the main factor in diminishing cultivated acreage. An increase in family income resulted from engaging in commercialized cotton handicrafts, giving rise to the institution of "partial inheritance", which in its turn led to the reduction of cultivated acreage. This will adequately explain the socio-economic development of the Chinese peasantry, resulting in the emergence of the peasant smallholder with a side job as a characteristic figure of modern rural China.

「近代における華北農村の変容過程と農家経営の展開－河北省定県を例として」

三品英憲

『社会経済史学』（社会経済史学会） ( 社会経済史学会 )  66巻2号 ( 2 ) 69 - 87   2000年07月  [査読有り]

　概要を見る

The purpose of this paper is to examine economic change in farming districts in modern north China, focusing on the shift in the relative importance of farming and off-farm occupations in different peasant households. After the construction of the Beijing-Hankou railroad in Ding county in 1900, in one particular area that was both situated along the railroad and suitable for cotton cultivation, peasant households began to use their male labor force to produce cotton handicrafts for sale. In other areas, however, geographic and geological conditions resulted in the persistence of biannual triple cropping. Later, the demand for cotton textiles led more and more peasant households in the former area to concentrate on cotton handicrafts, to the extent of cutting down their cultivated acreage. Accordingly, it became increasingly difficult for them to give up cotton handicrafts even during recessions. That was the reason why American strains of cotton, which could not be used for handicraft production, were cultivated not in the former area, but in the latter ones, after irrigation. In other words, each peasant household decided its course based on its own existing reproduction structure. This is why the process of commercialization in rural modern north China exhibited regional differences.

DOI

「近代中国農村研究における『小ブルジョア的発展論』について」

三品英憲

『歴史学研究』（歴史学研究会） ( 青木書店 )  735 ( 735 ) 35 - 45   2000年04月  [査読有り]