論文 - 高岡　伸行

企業責任とビジネスにおける目的達成をめぐる相克

高岡伸行

経済理論 ( 和歌山大学 )  351 ( 351 ) 85 - 111   2009年09月

戦略的企業フィランソロピー構想の陥穽

高岡伸行

経済理論 ( 和歌山大学 )  348 ( 348 ) 31 - 57   2009年03月

CSRの相克

高岡伸行, 吉田高文 (担当区分： 責任著者 )

九州経済学会年報 ( 九州経済学会 )  46   133 - 137   2008年12月  [査読有り]

SRB（Socially Responsible Business）概念の構成要素とその位相

高岡伸行

経済理論   340 ( 340 ) 15 - 41   2007年11月

ビジネスの正統性とイノベーションドライブに向けたステイクホルダーの統合様式

高岡伸行

経営と経済 ( 長崎大学 )  85 ( 3,4 ) 99 - 145   2006年02月

　概要を見る

This paper considers the relation with the style of stakeholder integration to the character of legitimacy of business and innovations. It is that the style of stakeholder integration might influence the character of business as such. Recently, it is thought that stakeholders give the legitimacy to businesses. However, there are two logics to identify stakeholders. Therefore, the character of legitimacy given to the businesses is different according to whether the relation to what stakeholders is assumed. Moreover, the nature of the relation to stakeholders influences not only the legitimacy of the businesses, but also the character of the innovation that is produced by the businesses. To clarify these, this paper examines the following three tasks; the concept of legitimacy of business; the logic of identification of stakeholders; the way of stakeholder integration. Finally, this paper points out that the way of stakeholder integration or organizing stakeholders influences a given legitimacy and a driven innovations.

CSRパースペクティブの転換

高岡伸行

日本経営学会誌 ( 日本経営学会 )  13 ( 13 ) 3 - 16   2005年  [査読有り]

　概要を見る

The present paper deals with changes and shifts of perspective of corporate social responsibility, or corporate understanding of CSR. According to Frederick (1986, 1994, 1998a), the ways of thinking of CSR can be categorized into four types: CSR1 (corporate social responsibility), CSR2 (corporate social responsiveness), CSR3 (corporate social rectitude), and CSR4 (cosmos, science, religion). Basically, CSR1 prescriptively identifies the content of the social responsibility of the corporation as a social institution and the basis of its justification; CSR2 discusses how to effectively fulfill those various responsibilities; CSR3 judges ethical and social consistency in an organization's decision-making and other behaviors in relation to its social responsibilities. In CSR2 and CSR3, how to fulfill the corporate social responsibilities as a business organization and its quality are discussed. The changes of CSR1-2-3 can be understood as a series of transformation on a continuous line, while CSR4 accompanies a paradigm shift in the ways of thinking. CSR4, which has come under a rather strong influence of the science of complex systems, is characterized by breaking off from its corporate-centered point of view and a separatist or dichotomous viewing business and society. The present paper reveals the differences and shifts of CSR perspectives by comparing CSR4 with CSR1-2-3 as well as by considering the logic for the concept of CSR4. In other words, it deals with characteristics of four CSR perspectives and differences between CSR1-2-3 and CSR4. It, furthermore, develops Frederick's views and also refers to the scope and possibilities of CSR4 in irradiating corporate social responsibility phenomena.

DOI

CSRマネジメントシステムの設計思想

高岡伸行

経営と経済   84 ( 3 ) 253 - 282   2004年12月

ステイクホルダー思考の解明

高岡伸行

研究年報（長崎大学経済学部） ( 長崎大学 )  20   37 - 51   2004年03月

　概要を見る

Carroll (1995, p.71) has argued that 'stakeholder thinking is a powerful way of visualizing organizations and their social responsibilities'. In general, we agree to his view. However, there are two styles in stakeholder thinking. It includes intrinsic stakeholder thinking and strategic stakeholder one. Each style quite differs in how to identify stakeholders, especially nature of identified stakeholders, and how to deal with the identified stakeholders. Which styles of thinking are useful for visualizing the social responsibilities in businesses? This paper unfolds the constitution of stakeholder thinking to provide a compass to the question.

ボールデイングの社会進化論的システム観にみる企業と社会の関係観

高岡伸行

経営と経済   83 ( 1 ) 161 - 186   2003年06月

コンシューマーリズムとグリーンコンシューマーリズム

高岡伸行

東南アジア研究年報 ( 長崎大学 )  44 ( 44 ) 45 - 68   2003年03月

　概要を見る

This article identifies the character of green-consumerism as a social movement. Although consumerism as a social movement is characterized by the claim for rights of consumers-own-self, that is, self-interest for consumers, the green-con-sumerism is characterized by the consideration and responsibility toward others. Accordingly, the meaning of the action as a consumer differs also with normal consumerism. The performance of green-consumers is characterized by pro-sociality. The pro-sociality is based on the reflection on which the action of consumotion of consumers influences on others or society. This article identifies these two character to develop a alternative perspective on business environment.

ステイクホルダーモデルの脱構築

高岡伸行, 谷口勇仁 (担当区分： 責任著者 )

日本経営学会誌 ( 日本経営学会 )  9 ( 9 ) 14 - 25   2003年01月  [査読有り]

　概要を見る

In this paper, we try to deconstruct on the existing stakeholder model of the modern corporation. The stakeholder model has been a fundamental framework in business and society. Based on this model, many of stakeholder theorists have developed a management theory and a theory of the firm. The stakeholder model is used to attain two separate aims. On one hand, it is applied in the field of stakeholder management aiming at effective management, where focus is placed on the differentiation of each stakeholder. On the other hand, it is also applied as theory of the firm aiming at verification of stakeholder legitimacy, where emphasis is placed on the integration of each stakeholder. Thus, the logic of the stakeholder model is different by application. This model is so far formed on the assumption that the environment of corporations is composed of nothing but stakeholders, where the relationship between the corporation and stakeholders is consequently regarded as a relationship between the corporation and society. This duality of the model's application can be attributed to the treatment of stakeholders in the model. In the model, the stakeholder group is classified in terms of the influence on businesses of the stake, where the stakeholders are treated solely based on functionalism from the viewpoint of the corporation. The existing stakeholder model might bring about a distortional perspective of the relationship between the corporation and society, or of the roles of business in society. We criticize these problems as a pitfall of the existing stakeholder model. Hence, an alternative model which transforms the existing stakeholder model by placing the two constituents of the stakeholder concept on separate dimensions is presented. To reveal the logic of the transformation is our primary task in this paper.

DOI

ステイクホルダーモデルの企業観とその論理構造

高岡伸行

経済科学 ( 学術雑誌目次速報データベース由来 )  49 ( 4) ) 99 - 119   2002年03月

企業環境行動におけるサステナビリティー概念の位相

高岡伸行

経営と経済 ( 長崎大学 )  79 ( 1 ) 87 - 125   1999年06月

　概要を見る

There are two different paradigms in viewing corporate environmental behavior: the first is Corporate Environmentalism, and the second is Sustainable Development. The purpose of this paper is to consider how to deconstruct the perspectives of environmental issues in business administration and management theories, with showing the varieties of perspectives in terms of corporate environmental behavior in these two paradigms. Fist, we consider transformation of corporate environmental Management style in the frame of Corporate Environmentalism from the viewpoint of eco-efficiency as the update style. In addition, eco-efficiency is also one of a style of sustainability concept in business fields asserted by WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development). There are two alternative styles in the frame of Sustainable Development; social-sustainability and ecological-sustainability. We focus on these styles to consider how to deconstruct the perspectives of environmental issues.

企業評価団体のネットワーク

高岡伸行

経営行動研究年報   ( 6 ) 58 - 64   1997年

企業環境主義のメタ構造

高岡伸行

組織科学   30 ( 1 ) 54 - 67   1996年09月  [査読有り]