Updated on 2024/04/11

写真a

 
SAKAMA Chiaki
 
Name of department
Faculty of Systems Engineering, Intelligent Informatics
Job title
Professor
Concurrent post
Informatics Division(Professor)
Mail Address
E-mail address
Homepage
External link

Education

  • 1995
    -
    Now

    Kyoto University   Graduate School of Engineering   Dr Engineering  

  • -
    1985

    Kyoto University   Faculty of Engineering   Dept. Information Science  

Degree

  • Doctor of Engineering

Academic & Professional Experience

  • 2005.04
    -
    Now

    Wakayama University   Faculty of Systems Engineering   Professor

  • 2002.04
    -
    2005.03

    Wakayama University   Center for Information Science   Professor

  • 1996.04
    -
    2002.03

    Wakayama University   Faculty of Systems Engineering   Associate Professor

  • 1995.04
    -
    1996.03

    Wakayama University   Faculty of Systems Engineering   Lecturer

  • 1989.05
    -
    1995.03

    Advanced Software Technology and Mechtronics Research Institute   Researcher

  • 1986.04
    -
    1989.03

    Institute for New Generation Computer Technology   Researcher

  • 1985.04
    -
    1989.04

    Toshiba Corporation   Researcher

▼display all

Research Areas

  • Informatics / Intelligent informatics

Classes (including Experimental Classes, Seminars, Graduation Thesis Guidance, Graduation Research, and Topical Research)

  • 2022   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2022   Discrete Mathematics 2   Specialized Subjects

  • 2022   Discrete Mathematics 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2022   Intelligent Informatics Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2022   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2022   Introductory Seminar in Systems Engineering   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Intelligent Informatics Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Discrete Mathematics 2   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Discrete Mathematics 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2021   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2020   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2020   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2020   Introductory Seminar in Systems Engineering   Specialized Subjects

  • 2020   Discrete Mathematics 2   Specialized Subjects

  • 2020   Discrete Mathematics 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2020   Intelligent Informatics Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Intelligent Informatics Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2019   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2018   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2018   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2018   Intelligent Informatics Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2018   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2018   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2018   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2017   Logical Thinking   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2017   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2017   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2017   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2017   Introductory Seminar in Systems Engineering   Specialized Subjects

  • 2017   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Introductory Seminar in Systems Engineering   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2016   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Introduction to Majors 1   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2015   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2014   Introductory Seminar   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2014   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2014   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2014   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2013   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2013   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2013   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Introductory Seminar   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2012   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2012   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2012   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2012   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Modern Information Technology   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2011   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2010   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2010   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2010   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2010   Introductory Seminar   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2010   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2010   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2010   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2009   Introduction to information science   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2008   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2008   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2008   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2008   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2008   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2008   NA   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2008   Introductory Seminar   Specialized Subjects

  • 2007   Scientific and Technical English   Specialized Subjects

  • 2007   Discrete Mathematics   Specialized Subjects

  • 2007   Introduction to Computer and Communication Sciences   Specialized Subjects

  • 2007   Graduation Research   Specialized Subjects

  • 2007   NA   Liberal Arts and Sciences Subjects

  • 2007   Computer and Communication Sciences Seminar   Specialized Subjects

▼display all

Classes

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2022   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2022   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2021   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2021   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2020   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2020   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2019   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2019   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Global Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2018   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2018   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ   Doctoral Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2017   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2017   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Advanced Research   Doctoral Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ   Doctoral Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2016   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB   Master's Course

  • 2016   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA   Master's Course

  • 2015   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2015   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2014   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2014   NA  

  • 2014   NA  

  • 2014   NA  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2014   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2014   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2013   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2013   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2013   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2012   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡA  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠA  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering SeminarⅡB  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering SeminarⅠB  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2012   NA   Master's Course

  • 2012   NA   Master's Course

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2012   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2012   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡB  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅡA  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠB  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Project SeminarⅠA  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Research  

  • 2011   NA  

  • 2011   NA  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅱ  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2011   Systems Engineering Advanced Seminar Ⅰ  

  • 2011   Advances in Artificial Intelligence  

  • 2010   NA   Master's Course

  • 2010   NA   Master's Course

  • 2010   NA   Master's Course

  • 2010   NA   Master's Course

  • 2010   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2009   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2009   NA   Master's Course

  • 2009   NA   Master's Course

  • 2009   NA   Master's Course

  • 2009   NA   Master's Course

  • 2008   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2008   NA   Master's Course

  • 2008   NA   Master's Course

  • 2008   NA   Master's Course

  • 2008   NA   Master's Course

  • 2007   Advances in Artificial Intelligence   Master's Course

  • 2007   NA   Master's Course

  • 2007   NA   Master's Course

  • 2007   NA   Master's Course

  • 2007   NA   Master's Course

▼display all

Satellite Courses

  • 2014   Information Science and Technology  

Research Interests

  • computational logic

  • Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

  • Program Transformation

  • multiagent system

  • Formal Argumentation

  • Logic Programming

  • Artificial Intelligence

▼display all

Published Papers

  • Linear Algebraic Abduction with Partial Evaluation

    Tuan Nguyen, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages ( Springer Nature Switzerland )    197 - 215   2023

    DOI

  • Enhancing Linear Algebraic Computation of Logic Programs Using Sparse Representation.

    Tuan Nguyen Quoc, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    New Generation Computing   40 ( 1 ) 225 - 254   2022

    DOI

  • Interlinking Logic Programs and Argumentation Frameworks.

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son

    LPNMR     322 - 335   2022

    DOI

  • Logic programming in tensor spaces.

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue, Taisuke Sato (Part: Lead author )

    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence   89 ( 12 ) 1133 - 1153   2021.12  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Predicting Air Ticket Demand using Deep Neural Networks

    Kodai Imanaka, Chiaki Sakama (Part: Corresponding author )

    IEEE International Conference on Big Data     2021.12  [Refereed]

  • Interlinking Logic Programs and Argumentation Frameworks

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son (Part: Lead author )

    19th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-2021)     322 - 335   2021.11  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Linear Algebraic Computation of Propositional Horn Abduction

    Tuan Nguyen Quoc, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) ( IEEE )    240 - 247   2021.11  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Feature Learning by Least Generalization

    Hien D. Nguyen, Chiaki Sakama (Part: Corresponding author )

    30th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming/1st International Joint Conference on Learning & Reasoning (IJCLR)     2021.10  [Refereed]

  • Deception in Epistemic Causal Logic

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    2nd International Workshop on Deceptive AI     2021.08  [Refereed]

  • An Efficient Reasoning Method on Logic Programming using Partial Evaluation in Vector Spaces

    Hien D. Nguyen, Chiaki Sakama, Taisuke Sato, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Corresponding author )

    Journal of Logic and Computation   31 ( 5 ) 1298 - 1316   2021.03  [Refereed]

  • A Principle-based Robustness Analysis of Admissibility-based Argumentation Semantics

    Tjitze Rienstra, Chiaki Sakama, Leendert van der Torre, Beishui Liao

    Argument & Computation   11 ( 3 ) 305 - 339   2020.11  [Refereed]

  • Epistemic Argumentation Framework: Theory and Computation

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research   69   1103 - 1126   2020.11  [Refereed]

  • Enhancing Linear Algebraic Computation of Logic Programs Using Sparse Representation

    Tuan Nguyen Quoc, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama (Part: Last author )

    Proceedings 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (Technical Communications), EPTCS 325   40 ( 1 ) 192 - 205   2020.09  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • From 3-valued Semantics to Supported Model Computation for Logic Programs in Vector Spaces.

    Taisuke Sato, Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2020; Valletta, Malta, 22-24 February 2020) ( SCITEPRESS )    758 - 765   2020.02  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Ordering Argumentation Frameworks.

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  11726   87 - 98   2019.09  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • A New Algorithm for Computing Least Generalization of a Set of Atoms

    Hien D. Nguyen, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2019     2019.08  [Refereed]

  • Epistemic Argumentation Framework.

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2019), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  11670   718 - 732   2019.08  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Learning Inference Rules from Data.

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue, Tony Ribeiro (Part: Lead author )

    KI - Kunstliche Intelligenz   33 ( 3 ) 267 - 278   2019  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Disjunctive Abduction.

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    New Generation Computing   37 ( 2 ) 219 - 243   2019  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Partial Evaluation of Logic Programs in Vector Spaces.

    Chiaki Sakama, Hien D. Nguyen, Taisuke Sato, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2018),CoRR   abs/1811.11435   2018  [Refereed]

  • Abducing Relations in Continuous Spaces.

    Taisuke Sato, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18) ( ijcai.org )    1956 - 1962   2018  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Abduction in argumentation frameworks.

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics   28 ( 2-3 ) 218 - 239   2018  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Computing Logic Programming Semantics in Linear Algebra.

    Hien D. Nguyen, Chiaki Sakama, Taisuke Sato, Katsumi Inoue

    in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence (MIWAI 2018), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  11248   32 - 48   2018  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Representing Argumentation Frameworks in Answer Set Programming.

    Chiaki Sakama, Tjitze Rienstra (Part: Lead author )

    Fundamenta Informaticae   155 ( 3 ) 261 - 292   2017  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • A Causal Theory of Speech Acts.

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic, Rationality and Interaction (LORI VI), Lecture Notes in Computer Science ( Springer )  10455   658 - 663   2017  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Linear Algebraic Characterization of Logic Programs.

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue, Taisuke Sato (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2017), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  1041   520 - 533   2017  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Abduction, conversational implicature and misleading in human dialogues.

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Logic Journal of the IGPL,   24 ( 4 ) 526 - 541   2016  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Abduction, Conversational Implicature, and Misleading

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    The International Conference on Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology (MBR’015_ITALY; Sestri Levante, Italy)     2015.06  [Refereed]

  • Learning Delayed Influences of Biological Systems

    Tony Ribeiro, Morgan Magnin, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology   2 ( 81 )   2015  [Refereed]

  • Learning Inference by Induction.

    Chiaki Sakama, Tony Ribeiro, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2015), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  9575   183 - 199   2015  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Multiagent Collaborative Search with Self-Interested Agents

    Ryuki Shimoji, Chiaki Sakama

    2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY (WI-IAT), VOL 2 ( IEEE COMPUTER SOC )    242 - 249   2015  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper presents an experimental study on collaborative search by distributed autonomous agents. We consider a problem such that multiple agents search for target objects in a field, and communicate with each other to exchange information of objects. Agents have six different strategies: cooperative, skeptical, free rider, liar, skeptical liar and solitary. These strategies characterize behaviors of agents for transmitting/receiving information in different ways. We observe the effect of self-interested agents who act non-cooperatively or even act deceptively to increase their own profits. We identify situations in which self-interested agents have advantages and investigate conditions which are effective to suppress the development of self-interested agents.

    DOI

  • Abduction and Conversational Implicature (Extended Abstract).

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    7th International Conference on Model-based Reasoning in Scientific and Technology (MBR'15) ( AAAI Press )    2015  [Refereed]

  • Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics

    Tjitze Rienstra, Chiaki Sakama, Leendert van der Torre

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) ( Springer Verlag )  9524   211 - 225   2015  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    We study a number of properties concerning the behaviour of semantics for Dung style abstract argumentation when the argumentation framework changes. The properties are concerned with how the evaluation of an argumentation framework changes if an attack between two arguments is added or removed. The results provide insight into the behaviour of these semantics in a dynamic context.

    DOI

  • Can Machines Learn Logics?

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI-15), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  9205   341 - 351   2015  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • On the Issue of Argumentation and Informedness.

    Martin Caminada, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   10091   317 - 330   2015  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Representing Argumentation Frameworks in Answer Set Programming

    Chiaki Sakama, Tjitze Rienstra (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proc. 1st International Workshop on Argumentation and Logic Programming (ArgLP 2015)     2015  [Refereed]

  • A Formal Account of Deception.

    Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall 2015 Symposium on Deceptive and Counter-Deceptive Machines, Technical Report FS-15-03, AAAI Press ( AAAI Press )    34 - 41   2015  [Refereed]

  • Learning Multi-valued Biological Models with Delayed Influence from Time-Series Observations.

    Tony Ribeiro, Morgan Magnin, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'15) ( IEEE )    25 - 31   2015  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • A formal account of dishonesty.

    Chiaki Sakama, Martin Caminada, Andreas Herzig (Part: Lead author )

    Logic Journal of the IGPL   23 ( 2 ) 259 - 294   2015  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Learning from interpretation transition

    Katsumi Inoue, Tony Ribeiro, Chiaki Sakama

    Machine Learning   94 ( 1 ) 51 - 79   2014.01  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    We propose a novel framework for learning normal logic programs from transitions of interpretations. Given a set of pairs of interpretations (I,J) such that J=T P (I), where T P is the immediate consequence operator, we infer the program P. The learning framework can be repeatedly applied for identifying Boolean networks from basins of attraction. Two algorithms have been implemented for this learning task, and are compared using examples from the biological literature. We also show how to incorporate background knowledge and inductive biases, then apply the framework to learning transition rules of cellular automata. © 2013 The Author(s).

    DOI

  • Counterfactual Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications ( IOS Press )  266   385 - 396   2014  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In a formal argumentation framework, one is interested in whether a particular argument is accepted or not under argumentation semantics. When an argument A is accepted, on the other hand, one may ask a question 'what if A were rejected?' We formulate such counterfactual reasoning in abstract argumentation frameworks. Based on Lewis's logic, we define two counterfactual conditionals in AF and investigate formal properties. We also argue counterfactual dependencies in AF and modal interpretation of AF in terms of counterfactual conditionals.

    DOI

  • Formalizing negotiations using logic programming

    Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Chiaki Sakama

    ACM Transactions on Computational Logic ( Association for Computing Machinery )  15 ( 2 ) 12   2014  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    The article introduces a logical framework for negotiation among dishonest agents. The framework relies on the use of abductive logic programming as a knowledge representation language for agents to deal with incomplete information and preferences. The article shows how intentionally false or inaccurate information of agents can be encoded in the agents' knowledge bases. Such disinformation can be effectively used in the process of negotiation to have desired outcomes by agents. The negotiation processes are formulated under the answer set semantics of abductive logic programming, and they enable the exploration of various strategies that agents can employ in their negotiation. A preliminary implementation has been developed using the ASP-Prolog platform. © 2014 ACM.

    DOI

  • Abduction in argumentation frameworks and its use in debate games

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) ( Springer Verlag )  8417   285 - 303   2014  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper studies an abduction problem in formal argumentation frameworks. Given an argument, an agent verifies whether the argument is justified or not in its argumentation framework. If the argument is not justified, the agent seeks conditions to explain the argument in its argumentation framework. We formulate such abductive reasoning in argumentation semantics and provide its computation in logic programming. Next we apply abduction in argumentation frameworks to reasoning by players in debate games. In debate games, two players have their own argumentation frameworks and each player builds claims to refute the opponent. A player may provide false or inaccurate arguments as a tactic to win the game. We show that abduction is used not only for seeking counter-claims but also for building dishonest claims in debate games.

    DOI

  • Computing Least Generalization by Anti-combination

    Mikio Yoshida, Chiaki Sakama

    24th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2014)     2014  [Refereed]

  • Evolution of Self-interested Agents: An Experimental Study

    Naoki Yamada, Chiaki Sakama

    MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  8271   329 - 340   2013  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In this paper, we perform an experimental study to examine the evolution of self-interested agents in cooperative agent societies. To this end, we realize a multiagent system in which agents initially behave altruistically by sharing information of food. After generations of a genetic algorithm, we observe the emergence of selfish agents who do not share food information. The experimental results show the process of evolving self-interested agents in resource-restrictive environments, which is observed in nature and in human society.

  • Learning dishonesty

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)   7842   225 - 240   2013  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Children behave dishonestly as a way of managing problems in daily life. Then our primary interest of this paper is how children learn dishonesty and how one could model human acquisition of dishonesty using machine learning techniques. We first observe the structural similarities between dishonest reasoning and induction, and then characterize mental processes of dishonest reasoning using logic programming. We argue how one develops behavioral rules for dishonest acts and refines them to more advanced rules. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

    DOI

  • A BDD-Based Algorithm for Learning from Interpretation Transition

    Tony Ribeiro, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  8812   47 - 63   2013  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In recent years, there has been an extensive interest in learning the dynamics of systems. For this purpose, a new learning method called learning from interpretation transition has been proposed recently [1]. However, both the run time and the memory space of this algorithm are exponential, so a better data structure and an efficient algorithm have been awaited. In this paper, we propose a new learning algorithm of this method utilizing an efficient data structure inspired from Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams. We show empirically that using this representation we can perform the same learning task faster with less memory space.

    DOI

  • Debate Games in Logic Programming

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   8439   185 - 201   2013  [Refereed]

  • Abduction, Unpredictability and Garden of Eden

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Logic Journal of the IGPL   21 ( 6 ) 980 - 998   2013  [Refereed]

  • A Formal Model of Dishonest Communication

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Workshop on Formal Models of Communication     2012  [Refereed]  [Invited]

  • Confidentiality-Preserving Publishing of EDPs for Credulous and Skeptical Users

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama, Lena Wiese

    in: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2011), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   7773   134 - 151   2012  [Refereed]

  • Oscillating behavior of logic programs

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)   7265   345 - 362   2012  [Refereed]  [Invited]

     View Summary

    We examine oscillation behavior of normal logic programs. Both the Gelfond-Lifschitz operator and the T P operator are used to update Herbrand interpretations, and any interpretation finally reaches in an oscillator. It has been shown that the supported model semantics of normal logic programs can characterize point attractors of Boolean networks. We here newly define supported classes of normal logic programs to investigate periodic oscillation induced by the T P operator, and apply them to characterize cycle attractors of Boolean networks. We also relate stable classes and supported classes of normal logic programs. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    DOI

  • Dishonest Arguments in Debate Games

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Computational Models of Argument ( IOS PRESS )  245   177 - 184   2012  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In this paper we consider a debate game between two players in which a player may provide false or inaccurate arguments as a tactic to win the game. We formulate a debate game using a formal argumentation framework and investigate situation where a player may provide dishonest arguments in the game. We also argue how a player can detect dishonest arguments of the opponent player.

    DOI

  • Inductive equivalence in clausal logic and nonmonotonic logic programming

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Machine Learning   83 ( 1 ) 1 - 29   2011.04  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper provides a logical framework for comparing inductive capabilities among agents having different background theories. A background theory is called inductively equivalent to another background theory if the two theories induce the same hypotheses for any observation. Conditions of inductive equivalence change depending on the logic of representation languages and the logic of induction or inductive logic programming (ILP). In this paper, we consider clausal logic and nonmonotonic logic programs as representation languages for background theories. Then we investigate conditions of inductive equivalence in four different frameworks of induction, cautious induction, brave induction, learning from satisfiability, and descriptive induction . We observe that several induction algorithms in Horn ILP systems require weaker conditions of equivalence under restricted problem settings. We address that inductive equivalence can be used for verification and evaluation of induction algorithms, and argue problems for optimizing background theories in ILP. © 2010 The Author(s).

    DOI

  • ASP-prolog for negotiation among dishonest agents

    Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Chiaki Sakama

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)   6645   331 - 344   2011  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper describes a platform to develop negotiating agents, whose knowledge and rules of behavior are represented as Abductive Logic Programs. The platform implements a flexible negotiation framework. Negotiating agents can operate with multiple goals and incomplete knowledge, and dynamically modify their goals depending on the progress of the negotiation exchanges. Differently from other frameworks, agents can operate dishonestly, by generating false statements or statements that are not substantiated by the agents' knowledge. The proposed platform has been implemented using the ASP-Prolog platform. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    DOI

  • Logical Definitions of Lying

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies (TRUST11),     2011  [Refereed]

  • Dishonest Reasoning by Abduction

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-11)     1063 - 1068   2011  [Refereed]

  • Exploring relations between answer set programs

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)   6565   91 - 110   2011  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Equivalence and generality relations over logic programs have been proposed in answer set programming to semantically compare information contents of logic programs. In this paper, we overview previous relations of answer set programs, and propose a general framework that subsumes previous relations. The proposed framework allows us to compare programs possibly having non-minimal answer sets as well as to explore new relations between programs. Such new relations include relativized variants of generality relations over logic programs. By selecting contexts for comparison, the proposed framework can represent weak, strong and uniform variants of generality, inclusion and equivalence relations. These new relations can be applied to comparison of abductive logic programs and coordination of multiple answer set programs. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    DOI

  • Formalizing Commitments Using Action Languages

    Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT 2011), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   7169   67 - 83   2011  [Refereed]

  • A logical formulation for negotiation among dishonest agents

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli (Part: Lead author )

    IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence     1069 - 1074   2011  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    The paper introduces a logical framework for negotiation among dishonest agents. The framework relies on the use of abductive logic programming as a knowledge representation language for agents to deal with incomplete information and preferences. The paper shows how intentionally false or inaccurate information of agents could be encoded in the agents' knowledge bases. Such disinformation can be effectively used in the process of negotiation to have desired outcomes by agents. The negotiation processes are formulated under the answer set semantics of abductive logic programming and enable the exploration of various strategies that agents can employ in their negotiation.

    DOI

  • A Logical Account of Lying

    Chiaki Sakama, Martin Caminada, Andreas Herzig (Part: Lead author )

    LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, JELIA 2010 ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  6341   286 - 299   2010  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper aims at providing a formal account of lying - a dishonest attitude of human beings. We first formulate lying under propositional modal logic and present basic properties for it. We then investigate why one engages in lying and how one reasons about lying. We distinguish between offensive and defensive lies, or deductive and abductive lies, based on intention behind the act. We also study two weak forms of dishonesty, bullshit and deception, and provide their logical features in contrast to lying. We finally argue dishonesty postulates that agents should try to satisfy for both moral and self-interested reasons.

  • Interacting Answer Sets

    Chiaki Sakama, Tran Cao Son (Part: Lead author )

    COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  6214   122 - +   2010  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    We consider agent societies represented by logic programs. Four different types of social interactions among agents, cooperation, competition, norms, and subjection, are formulated as interactions between answer sets of different programs. Answer sets satisfying conditions of interactions represent solutions coordinated in a multiagent society. A unique feature of our framework is that answer set interactions are specified outside of individual programs. This enables us to freely change the social specifications among agents without the need of modifying individual programs and to separate beliefs of agents from social requirements over them. Social interactions among agents are encoded in a single logic program using constraints. Coordinated solutions are then computed using answer set programming.

  • Exploring Relations between Answer Set Programs

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Proceedings of the Symposium on Constructive Mathematics in Computer Science [Also to appear in: Marcello Balduccini and Tran Cao Son (eds.), Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Essays in Honour of Michael Gelfond,・・・     72 - 91   2010  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Proceedings of the Symposium on Constructive Mathematics in Computer Science [Also to appear in: Marcello Balduccini and Tran Cao Son (eds.), Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Essays in Honour of Michael Gelfond, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2011.]

  • The Many Faces of Deception

    Chiaki Sakama, Martin Caminada (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the Thirty Years of Nonmonotonic Reasoning (NonMon@30)     2010  [Refereed]

  • Brave Induction: A Logical Framework for Learning from Incomplete Information

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Machine Learning   76 ( 1 ) 3 - 35   2009  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Negotiation Using Logic Programming with Consistency Restoring Rules

    Tran Cao Son, Chiaki Sakama

    21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-09), PROCEEDINGS ( IJCAI-INT JOINT CONF ARTIF INTELL )    930 - 935   2009  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    We formalize negotiations using logic programming with consistency restoring rules (or CR-Prolog) [Balduccini and Gelfond, 2003]. Our formulation deals with incomplete information, preferences, and changing goals. We assume that each agent is equipped with a knowledge base for negotiation which consists of a CR-program, a set of possible assumptions, and a set of ordered goals. We use the notion of an answer set as a means to formalize the basic notions of negotiation such as proposal, response, negotiation, negotiation tree (protocol), etc. and discuss their properties.

  • Logic Programming for Multiagent Planning with Negotiation

    Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Chiaki Sakama

    LOGIC PROGRAMMING ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  5649   99 - +   2009  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Multiagent planning deals with the problem of generating plans for multiple agents. It requires formalizing ways for the agents to interact and cooperate, in order to achieve their goals. One way for the agents to interact is through negotiations. Integration of negotiation in multiagent planning has not been extensively investigated and a systematic way for this task has yet to be found. We develop a generic model for negotiation in dynamic environments and apply it to generate joint-plans with negotiation for multiple agents. We identify the minimal requirements for such a model and propose a general scheme for one-to-one negotiations. This model of negotiation is instantiated to deal with dynamic knowledge of planning agents. We demonstrate how logic programming can be employed as a uniform platform to support both planning and negotiation, providing an ideal testbed for experimenting with multiagent planning with negotiations.

  • Reasoning and Planning with Cooperative Actions for Multiagents Using Answer Set Programming

    Tran Cao Son, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT'09), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  5948   208 - 227   2009  [Refereed]

  • Equivalence Issues in Abduction and Induction,

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Applied Logic   7 ( 3 ) 318 - 328   2009  [Refereed]

  • Social Default Theories

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING, PROCEEDINGS ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  5753   470 - 476   2009  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper studies a default logic for social reasoning in multiagent systems. A social default, theory is a collection of default theories with which each agent reasons and behaves by taking attitudes of other agents into account. The semantics of a social default theory is given as social extensions which represent the agreement of beliefs of individual agents hi a society. We show the use of social default theories for representing social altitudes of agents and for reasoning ill cooperative planning and negotiation among multiple agents.

  • Coordination in answer set programming

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    ACM Transactions on Computational Logic   9 ( 2 ) Article A9 (30 pages)   2008.03  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This article studies a semantics of multiple logic programs, and synthesizes a program having such a collective semantics. More precisely, the following two problems are considered: given two logic programs P1 and P2, which have the collections of answer sets AS(P1) and AS(P2), respectively
    (i) find a program Q which has the set of answer sets such that AS(Q) = AS(P1) AS(P2)
    (ii) find a program R which has the set of answer sets such that AS(R) = AS(P1) ∩ AS(P2). A program Q satisfying the condition (i) is called generous coordination of P1 and P2
    and R satisfying (ii) is called rigorous coordination of P1 and P2. Generous coordination retains all of the answer sets of each program, but permits the introduction of additional answer sets of the other program. By contrast, rigorous coordination forces each program to give up some answer sets, but the result remains within the original answer sets for each program. Coordination provides a program that reflects the meaning of two or more programs. We provide methods for constructing these two types of coordination and address its application to logic-based multi-agent systems. © 2008 ACM.

    DOI

  • Comparing Abductive Theories

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    ECAI 2008, PROCEEDINGS ( IOS PRESS )  178   35 - +   2008  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper introduces two methods for comparing explanation power of different abductive theories. One is comparing explainability for observations, and the other is comparing explanation contents for observations. Those two measures are represented by generality relations over abductive theories. The generality relations are naturally related to the notion of abductive equivalence introduced by Inoue and Sakama. We also analyze the computational complexity of these relations.

    DOI

  • Inductive Negotiation in Answer Set Programming

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT'08) , Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   5397   143 - 160   2008  [Refereed]

  • Negotiation by Induction

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'08),     1459 - 1462   2008  [Refereed]

  • Brave Induction

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING, ILP 2008 ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  5194   261 - +   2008  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper considers the following induction problem. Given the background knowledge B and an observation 0, find a hypothesis H such that a consistent theory B A H has a minimal model satisfying O. We call this type of induction brave induction. Brave induction is different from explanatory induction in ILP, which requires that 0 is satisfied in every model of B A H. Brave induction is useful for learning disjunctive rules from observations, or learning from the background knowledge containing indefinite or incomplete information. We develop an algorithm for computing brave induction, and extend it to induction in answer set programming.

  • Identifying Cellular Automata Rules

    Ken-ichi Maeda, Chiaki Sakama

    Journal of Cellular Automata   2 ( 1 ) 1 - 20   2007  [Refereed]

  • Constructing Consensus Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Logic-based Program Synthesis and Transformation: Revised and Selected papers from the 16th International Symposium (LOPSTR'06), Lecture Notes in Computer Science   4407   26 - 42   2007  [Refereed]

  • Equivalence Issues in Abduction and Induction

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Proceedings of the 2007 International Workshop on Abduction and Induction in Artificial Intelligence and Bioinformatics (AIAI '07)     82 - 95   2007  [Refereed]

  • Generality and Equivalence Relations in Default Logic

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-07)     434 - 439   2007  [Refereed]

  • On the Existence of Answer Sets in Normal Extended Logic Programs

    Martin Caminada, Chiaki Sakama

    n: Proceedings of the 7th IJCAI International Workshop on Nonmontonic Reasoning, Action and Change (NRAC'07)     25 - 32   2007  [Refereed]

  • Negotiation by Abduction and Relaxation

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'07)     1018 - 1025   2007  [Refereed]

  • Abductive equivalence in first-order logic

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Logic Journal of the IGPL   14 ( 2 ) 333 - 346   2006.03  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In Artificial Intelligence, abduction is often formalized in first-order logic. In this article, we focus on the problem of identifying equivalence of two abductive theories represented in first-order logic. To this end, two definitions of equivalence are given for abduction. Explainable equivalence requires that two abductive theories have the same explainability for any observation. On the other hand, explanatory equivalence guarantees that any observation has exactly the same explanations in each abductive theory. Explanatory equivalence is a stronger notion than explainable equivalence. In first-order logic, explainable equivalence can be verified by the notion of extensional equivalence in default theories, while explanatory equivalence reduces to logical equivalence between background theories. We also show the complexity results for abductive equivalence. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

    DOI

  • Combining answer sets of nonmonotonic logic programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  3900   320 - 339   2006  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper studies compositional semantics of nonmonotonic logic programs. We suppose the answer set semantics of extended disjunctive programs and consider the following problem. Given two programs P-1 and P-2, which have the sets of answer sets AS(P-1) and AS(P-2), respectively; find a program Q which has answer sets as minimal sets S boolean OR T for S from AS(P-1) and T from AS(P-2). The program Q combines answer sets of P-1 and P-2, and provides a compositional semantics of two programs. Such program composition has application to coordinating knowledge bases in multi-agent environments. We provide methods for computing program composition and discuss their properties.

    DOI

  • On Abductive Equivalence

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering. Cognitive Science, Epistemology, Logic, Studies in Logic     333 - 352   2006  [Refereed]

  • Generality Relations in Answer Set Programming

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'06), Lecture Notes in Computer Science   4079   211 - 225   2006  [Refereed]

  • Ordering default theories and nonmonotonic logic programs

    C Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE ( ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV )  338 ( 1-3 ) 127 - 152   2005.06  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    First-order theories are ordered under logical entailment based on the amount of information derived from theories. In default logic, on the other hand, a theory contains default information as well as definite information. To order default theories, distinguishing different sorts of information is necessary to assess the information content of a default theory. For this purpose, we first introduce a multi-valued interpretation of default theories using a ten-valued bilattice. It distinguishes between definite and credulous/skeptical default information derived from a theory, and is used for ordering default theories based on their information contents. We then apply the technique to order nonmonotonic logic programs under the answer set semantics. The results of this paper provide a method for comparing default theories or nonmonotonic logic programs in a manner different from the conventional extension/model-based viewpoint. Moreover, they have important application to induction from nonmonotonic theories. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    DOI

  • Induction from answer sets in nonmonotonic logic programs

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    ACM Transactions on Computational Logic   6 ( 2 ) 203 - 231   2005.04  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Inductive logic programming (ILP) realizes inductive machine learning in computational logic. However, the present ILP mostly handles classical clausal programs, especially Horn logic programs, and has limited applications to learning nonmonotonic logic programs. This article studies a method for realizing induction in nonmonotonic logic programs. We consider an extended logic program as a background theory, and introduce techniques for inducing new rules using answer sets of the program. The produced new rules explain positive/negative examples in the context of inductive logic programming. The proposed methods extend the present ILP techniques to a syntactically and semantically richer framework, and contribute to a theory of nonmonotonic ILP. © 2005.

    DOI

  • Inductive Equivalence of Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Stefan Kramer and Bernhard Pfahringer (eds.), Inductive Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (ILP 2005), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   3625   312 - 329   2005  [Refereed]

  • Coordination between Logical Agents

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA-V), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  3487   161 - 177   2005  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In this paper we suppose an agent that has a knowledge base written in logic programming and sets of beliefs under the answer set semantics. We then consider the following two problems: given two logic programs P-1 and P-2, which have the sets of answer sets AS(P-1) and AS(P-2), respectively; (i) find a program Q which has the set of answer sets such that AS(Q) = AS(P-1) boolean OR AS(P-2); (ii) find a program R which has the set of answer sets such that AS(R) = AS(P-1) boolean AND AS(P-2). A program Q satisfying the condition (i) is called generous coordination of P-1 and P-2; and R satisfying (ii) is called rigorous coordination of P-1 and P-2. Generous coordination retains all of the original belief sets of each agent, but admits the introduction of additional belief sets of the other agent. By contrast, rigorous coordination forces each agent to give up some belief sets, but the result remains within the original belief sets for each agent. We provide methods for constructing these two types of coordination and discuss their properties.

  • Combining Answer Sets of Nonmonotonic Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Alessandro Provetti and Marina De Vos (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Answer Set Programming (ASP'05)     42 - 56   2005  [Refereed]

  • Equivalence in Abductive Logic

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05)     472 - 477   2005  [Refereed]

  • The PLP System

    Toshiko Wakaki, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Nitta

    in: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA'04), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   3229   706 - 709   2004  [Refereed]

  • Equivalence of Logic Programs under Updates

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Logics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference (JELIA 2004), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   3229   174 - 186   2004  [Refereed]

  • Disjunctive Explanations in Abductive Logic Programming

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Stephen Muggleton (ed.), Special Issue on Machine Intelligence 19, Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence   7   2004

  • Speculative Computation by Abduction in Agent Communication

    SATOH Ken, INOUE Katsumi, IWANUMA Koji, SAKAMA Chiaki, Ken Satoh, Katsumi Inoue, Koji Iwanuma, Chiaki Sakama

    Computer Software ( Japan Society for Software Science and Technology )  20 ( 1 ) 27 - 35   2003.01

     View Summary

    現在のマルチエージェントシステムでは,エージェントが他エージェントに質問を与えた場合に, 質問を受けたエージェントが答を返すまでは, 質問したエージェントの処理は中断されることが普通である. インターネットのような通信が必ずしも保証されていないような環境下においては, このような中断がデッドロックを引き起こすことがありうる.また, たとえ通信が完全であっても, 他エージェントの処理に時間がかかっていれば、通信が不完全な状態と同じような状態になることがありうる. 本論文は、このような通信が必ずしも保証されていないマルチエージェントシステムにおける分散問題解決の手法を与える. 本手法は, 質問に対するデフォルトの回答を用意しておき, 回答が戻らなくても, デフォルトを用いて計算を進め, その後, 送られてきた真の回答がデフォルトと異なるときのみ, 計算をやり直すというものである. 本論文では, マスタースレーブマルチエージェントシステムにおいて,副作用が存在しない処理での投機的計算手法を仮説論理プログラミングの枠組みで実現し, 手法の健全性を示す.

    DOI

  • エージェント間通信におけるアブダクションによる投機的計算 (A preliminary English version appeared as Satoh, K., Inoue, K., Iwanuma, K., Sakama, C., ``Speculative Computation by Abduction under Incomplete Communication Environments'', Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference

    佐藤 健, 井上 克己, 岩沼 宏治, 坂間 千秋

    コンピュータソフトウェア   20 ( 1 ) 27 - 35   2003.01  [Refereed]

  • Computing Preferred Answer Sets in Asnwer Set Programming

    Toshiko Wakaki, Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Nitta

    in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR'03), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   2850   259 - 273   2003  [Refereed]

  • Discovery of Cellular Automata Rules Using Cases

    Ken-ichi Maeda, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Discovery Science (DS'03), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   2843   357 - 364   2003  [Refereed]

  • Ordering Default Theories and Nonmonotonic Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03)     839 - 844   2003  [Refereed]

  • An Abductive Framework for Computing Knowledge Base Update

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (Cambridge University Press)   3 ( 6 ) 671 - 713   2003  [Refereed]

  • Disjunctive explanations

    K Inoue, C Sakama

    LOGICS PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  2401   317 - 332   2002  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    Abductive logic programming has been widely used to declaratively specify a variety of problems in AI including updates in data and knowledge bases, belief revision, diagnosis, causal theory, and default reasoning. One of the most significant issues in abductive logic programming is to develop a reasonable method for knowledge assimilation, which incorporates obtained explanations into the current knowledge base. This paper offers a solution to this problem by considering disjunctive explanations whenever multiple explanations exist. Disjunctive explanations axe then to be assimilated into the knowledge base so that the assimilated program preserves all and only minimal answer sets from the collection of all possible updated programs. We describe a new form of abductive logic programming which deals with disjunctive explanations in the framework of extended abduction. The proposed framework can be well applied to view updates in disjunctive databases.

  • Nonmonotonic Inductive Logic Programming

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR'01), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence   2173   62 - 80   2001  [Refereed]  [Invited]

  • Learning by Answer Sets

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Answer Set Programming, Technical Report SS-01-01, AAAI Press     181 - 187   2001  [Refereed]

  • A Defeasible Reasoning System in Multi-Agent Environments

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue, Koji Iwanuma, Ken Satoh (Part: Lead author )

    Proceedings of the CL2000 Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi Agent Systems, London UK (2000)     1 - 6   2000.01  [Refereed]

  • Abductive Logic Programming and Disjunctive Logic Programming : Their Relationship and Transferability

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Logic Programming   44 ( 1-3 ) 71 - 96   2000  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Inverse Entailment in Nonmonotonic Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-2000), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence ( Springer )  1866   209 - 224   2000  [Refereed]

  • Prioritized Logic Programming and its Application to Commonsense Reasoning(jointly worked)

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier   123 ( 1/2 ) 185 - 222   2000  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Speculative Computation by Abduction under Incomplete Communication Environments

    Ken Satoh, Katsumi Inoue, Koji Iwanuma, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'00), IEEE Computer Society     263 - 273   2000  [Refereed]

  • Updating extended logic programs through abduction

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) ( Springer Verlag )  1730   147 - 161   1999  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper introduces techniques for updating knowledge bases represented in extended logic programs. Three different types of updates, view updates, theory updates, and inconsistency removal, are considered. We formulate these updates through abduction, and provide methods for computing them with update programs. An update program is an extended logic program which specifies changes on abductive hypotheses, then updates are computed by the U-minimal answer sets of an update program. The proposed technique provides a uniform framework for these different types of updates, and each update is computed using existing procedures of logic programming.

    DOI

  • Abducing Priorities to Derive Intended Conclusions

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    n: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99)     44 - 49   1999  [Refereed]

  • Some properties of inverse resolution in normal logic programs

    C Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  1634   279 - 290   1999  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper studies the properties of inverse resolution in normal logic programs. The V-operators are known as operations for inductive generalization in definite logic programs. In the presence of negation as failure in a program, however, the V-operators do not work as generalization operations in general and often make a consistent program inconsistent. Moreover, they may destroy the syntactic structure of logic programs such as acyclicity and local stratification. On the procedural side, unrestricted application of the V-operators may lose answers computed in the original program and make queries flounder. We provide sufficient conditions for the V-operators to avoid these problems.

  • Computing extended abduction through transaction programs

    K Inoue, C Sakama

    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ( BALTZER SCI PUBL BV )  25 ( 3-4 ) 339 - 367   1999  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    To explain observations from nonmonotonic background theories, one often needs removal of some hypotheses as well as addition of other hypotheses. Moreover, some observations should not be explained, while some are to be explained. In order to formalize these situations, extended abduction was introduced by Inoue and Sakama (1995) to generalize traditional abduction in the sense that it can compute negative explanations by removing hypotheses and anti-explanations to unexplain negative observations. In this paper, we propose a computational mechanism for extended abduction. When a background theory is written in a normal logic program, we introduce its transaction program for computing extended abduction. A transaction program is a set of non-deterministic production rules that declaratively specify addition and deletion of abductive hypotheses. Abductive explanations are then computed by the fixpoint of a transaction program using a bottom-up model generation procedure. The correctness of the proposed procedure is shown for the class of acyclic covered abductive logic programs. In the context of deductive databases, a transaction program provides a declarative specification of database update.

  • Negation as failure in the head

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Journal of Logic Programming ( Elsevier Inc. )  35 ( 1 ) 39 - 78   1998  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    The class of logic programs with negation as failure in the head is a subset of the logic of MBNF introduced by Lifschitz and is an extension of the class of extended disjunctive programs. An interesting feature of such programs is that the minimality of answer sets does not hold. This paper considers the class of general extended disjunctive programs (GEDPs) as logic programs with negation as failure in the head. First, we discuss that the class of GEDPs is useful for representing knowledge in various domains in which the principle of minimality is too strong. In particular, the class of abductive programs is properly included in the class of GEDPs. Other applications include the representation of inclusive disjunctions and circumscription with fixed predicates. Secondly, the semantic nature of GEDPs is analyzed by the syntax of programs. In acyclic programs, negation as failure in the head can be shifted to the body without changing the answer sets of the program. On the other hand, supported sets of any program are always preserved by the same transformation. Thirdly, the computational complexity of the class of GEDPs is shown to remain in the same complexity class as normal disjunctive programs. Through the simulation of negation as failure in the head, computation of answer sets and supported sets is realized using any proof procedure for extended or positive disjunctive programs. Finally, a simple translation of GEDPs into autoepistemic logic is presented. © 1998 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

    DOI

  • On Generality in Abduction and Induction

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Peter Flach and Antonis Kakas (eds.), Proceedings of the ECAI'98 workshop on Abduction and Induction in AI     49 - 52   1998  [Refereed]

  • Specifying Transactions for Extended Abduction

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    A.G. Cohn and L. Schubert (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (KR '98)     394 - 405   1998  [Refereed]

  • Partial deduction in disjunctive logic programming

    C Sakama, H Seki (Part: Lead author )

    JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING ( ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC )  32 ( 3 ) 229 - 245   1997.09  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper presents a partial deduction method in disjunctive logic programming. Partial deduction in normal logic programs is based on unfolding between normal clauses, hence it is not applicable to disjunctive logic programs in general. Then we introduce a new partial deduction technique, called disjunctive partial deduction, which preserves the minimal model semantics of positive disjunctive programs and the stable model semantics of normal disjunctive programs. From the procedural side, disjunctive partial deduction is combined with a bottom-up proof procedure of disjunctive logic programs, and top-down partial deduction is introduced for query optimization. Disjunctive partial deduction is also applied to optimizing abductive logic programs and compiling propositional disjunctive programs. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1997.

    DOI

  • Representing Priorities in Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    M. Maher (ed.), Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 1996 Joint International Conference and Symposium (JICSLP'96)     82 - 96   1996.09  [Refereed]

  • A Fixpoint Characterization of Abductive Logic Programs

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Journal of Logic Programming, North-Holland   27 ( 2 ) 107 - 136   1996  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Paraconsistent stable semantics for extended disjunctive programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Logic and Computation   5 ( 3 ) 265 - 285   1995.06  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper presents declarative semantics of possibly inconsistent disjunctive logic programs. We introduce the paraconsistent minimal and stable model semantics for extended disjunctive programs, which can distinguish inconsistent information from other information in a program. These semantics are based on lattice-structured multi-valued logics, and are characterized by a new fixpoint semantics of extended disjunctive programs. Applications of the paraconsistent semantics for reasoning in inconsistent programs are also presented. © 1995 Oxford University Press.

    DOI

  • Embedding circumscriptive theories in general disjunctive programs

    C Sakama, K Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING ( SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN )  928   344 - 357   1995  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper presents a, method of embedding circumscriptive theories in general disjunctive programs. In a general disjunctive program, negation as failure occurs not only in the body but in the head of a rule. In this setting, minimized predicates of a circumscriptive theory are specified using the negation in the body, while fixed and varying predicates are expressed by the negation in the head. Moreover, the translation implies a close relationship between circumscription and abductive logic programming. That is, fixed and varying predicates in a circumscriptive theory are also viewed as abducible predicates in an abductive disjunctive program. Our method of translating circumscription into logic programming is fairly general compared with the existing approaches and exploits new applications of logic programming for representing commonsense knowledge.

  • The Effect of Partial Deduction in Abductive Reasoning

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'95)     383 - 397   1995  [Refereed]

  • Abductive framework for nonmonotonic theory change

    K Inoue, C Sakama

    IJCAI-95 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2 ( MORGAN KAUFMANN PUB INC )    204 - 210   1995  [Refereed]

  • An alternative approach to the semantics of disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    Journal of Automated Reasoning ( Kluwer Academic Publishers )  13 ( 1 ) 145 - 172   1994.02  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    In this paper, we study a new semantics of logic programming and deductive databases. The possible model semantics is introduced as a declarative semantics of disjunctive logic programs. The possible model semantics is an alternative theoretical framework to the classical minimal model semantics and provides a flexible inference mechanism for inferring negation in disjunctive logic programs. We also present a proof procedure for the possible model semantics and show that the possible model semantics has an advantage from the computational complexity point of view. © 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    DOI

  • On Positive Occurrences of Negation as Failure

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'94) ( Elsevier )    293 - 304   1994  [Refereed]

    DOI

  • Partial Deduction of Disjunctive Logic Programs: A Declarative Approach

    Chiaki Sakama, Hirohisa Seki (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR'94), Lecture Notes in Computer Science   883   170 - 182   1994  [Refereed]

  • On the Equivalence between Disjunctive and Abductive Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    P.V. Hentenryck (ed.), Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference (ICLP '94)     489 - 503   1994  [Refereed]

  • Representing Abduction by Positive not

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    P. Codognet, P.M. Dung, A.C. Kakas, and P. Mancarella (eds.), Proceedings of the ICLP'93 Post-conference Workshop on Abductive Reasoning     1 - 9   1993  [Refereed]

  • Relating Disjunctive Logic Programs to Default Theories

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    L.M. Pereira and A. Nerode (eds.), Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop (LP&NMR '93)     266 - 282   1993  [Refereed]

  • Transforming Abductive Logic Programs to Disjunctive Programs

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    D.S. Warren (ed.), Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference (ICLP '93)     335 - 353   1993  [Refereed]

  • Negation in Disjunctive Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue (Part: Lead author )

    D.S. Warren (ed.), Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference (ICLP '93)     703 - 719   1993  [Refereed]

  • Extended Well-founded Semantics for Paraconsistent Logic Programs

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems (FGCS'92)     592 - 599   1992  [Refereed]

  • Nonmonotonic parallel inheritance network

    Chiaki Sakama, Akira Okumura (Part: Lead author )

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) ( Springer Verlag )  383   53 - 66   1989  [Refereed]

     View Summary

    This paper discusses a theory of nonmonotonic inheritance reasoning in a semantic network and presents a parallel inheritance algorithm based on this approach.

    DOI

  • PARTIAL EVALUATION OF QUERIES IN DEDUCTIVE DATABASES

    C SAKAMA, H ITOH (Part: Lead author )

    NEW GENERATION COMPUTING ( SPRINGER VERLAG )  6 ( 2-3 ) 249 - 258   1988  [Refereed]

  • Handling Knowledge by its Representative

    Chiaki Sakama, Hidenori Itoh (Part: Lead author )

    in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Expert Database Systems (EDS'88)     551 - 565   1988  [Refereed]

▼display all

Books etc

  • Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IX

    Chiaki Sakama, Sebastian Sardina, Wamberto Vasconcelos, Michael Winikoff( Part: Edit)

    Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 7169, Springer-Verlag  2012 

  • Towards the Integration of Inductive and Nonmonotonic Logic Programming

    Setsuo Arikawa, Ayumi Shinohara( Part: Contributor,  Work: pages 178-188)

    Progress in Discovery Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol.2281, Springer-Verlag  2002 

  • Abductive Generalization and specialization

    Peter A. Flach, Antonis C. Kakas( Part: Contributor,  Work: 253-265)

    Abduction and Induction-Essays on their Relation and Integration, Kluwer Academic  2000 

  • Handling Knowledge by its Representative(jointly worked)

    L. Kerschberg( Part: Contributor,  Work: 551-565)

    Expert Database Systems, Beujamin/Cummings Publishers  1989 

Misc

  • 機械学習を用いた中学校体育ダンス授業支援システムの開発

    西尾 佳瑶子, 坂間 千秋 (Part: Last author )

    情報処理学会 コンピュータと教育研究会 169回研究発表会     2023.03

  • 詰将棋における指し手の意味の説明が可能なAIシステムの構築

    森岡 勇介, 坂間 千秋 (Part: Last author )

    情報処理学会第49回ゲーム情報学研究発表会     2023.03

  • 再帰型ニューラルネットワークによる航空券の需要予測

    今中 滉大, 坂間 千秋 (Part: Last author )

    第34回人工知能学会全国大会     2020.06

  • Reasoning and Programming in Artificial Intelligence

    井上 克巳, 坂間 千秋, 佐藤 泰介

    人工知能 : 人工知能学会誌 : journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence ( 人工知能学会 ; 2014- )  34 ( 5 ) 703 - 713   2019.09

  • Evolution of Self-interested Agents in Collaborative Environments

    下地 竜起, 坂間 千秋

    先進的学習科学と工学研究会 ( 人工知能学会 )  72   19 - 23   2014.11

  • Agent-based Negotiation with Q-learning

    北浦 愼也, 坂間 千秋

    先進的学習科学と工学研究会 ( 人工知能学会 )  72   14 - 18   2014.11

  • A game-theoretic analysis of electronic commerce : on the effect of customer reviews

    YOSHIDA Akihiro, SAKAMA Chiaki

    Mathematical Systems Science and its Applications : IEICE technical report ( The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers )  112 ( 383 ) 5 - 9   2013.01

     View Summary

    In electronic commerce, online customer reviews play an important role for users in making purchase decisions and selecting stores. On the other hand, there is an attempt to dupe users into believing that those reviews are honest comments by consumers while in fact they are disguised propaganda by a marketing company. In this study, we provide a game-theoretic model in which users make purchase decisions based on customer reviews, and then analyze the effect of those reviews on dealing between customers and stores.

  • Post-Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Learning and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LNMR 2013, Corunna, Spain)

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    CoRR arXiv:1311.4639, 2013     2013

  • Classifying two-dimensional Life and its variants

    高田 祐輔, 坂間 千秋

    研究報告数理モデル化と問題解決(MPS)   2012 ( 5 ) 1 - 6   2012.11

     View Summary

    本研究では, 2 次元セルオートマトンのライフゲームを変形した 「擬似ライフゲーム」 について, 「誕生」 「生存」 「死亡」 の各遷移規則の適用回数に基づく分類を行う.本研究の結果,従来とは異なる指標に基づく擬似ライフゲームの分類が示され, 3×3 トーラス空間における振る舞いに規則性が見られることが実験により確認された.In this study, we classify the two-dimensional Game of Life and its variants based on the number of applications of different transition rules. We show that the proposed method classifies those games in a manner different from the existing one, and we observe some behavioral rules of those games in 3×3 toroidal grids.

  • Building a knowledge circulation model for collecting cases in conceptual learning

    山本 匡, 坂間 千秋

    研究報告マルチメディア通信と分散処理(DPS)   2011 ( 10 ) 1 - 7   2011.09

     View Summary

    本研究では近年 Web 上に見られるようになった 「物当てゲーム」 の知識循環性と概念の事例収集特性に着目し,このゲームを概念学習における事例収集のために用いる方法を提案する.本システムの特徴は,過去のゲーム結果から概念を学習し,その結果を新たな概念の学習に利用できることである.また,多くの人にプレイされることにより,獲得される概念が平均化される 「集合知特性」 を持つ.実験の結果,本システムではゲームを繰り返すことにより概念学習が行われ,ゲーム効率が向上することが確かめられた.In this research, we propose a method of using a "read your mind" game on the Web for collecting cases in conceptual learning. The game has the property of knowledge circulation which uses the results of games for future learning. It can also collect cases effectively on the Web by using the wisdom of crowds. We build an experimental system and verify that the system learns concepts by playing games and improves its performance.

  • An Introduction to Action Languages(<Special Issue>Current Trends in Logic-Based Inference Techniques)

    SON Tran Cao, SAKAMA Chiaki, Tran Cao Son, Chiaki Sakama

    Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence ( 人工知能学会 )  25 ( 3 ) 379 - 388   2010.05

  • Answer Set Programming(<Special Issue>Current Trends in Logic-Based Inference Techniques)

    SAKAMA Chiaki, INOUE Katsumi, Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence ( 人工知能学会 )  25 ( 3 ) 368 - 378   2010.05

  • Editors' Introduction to "Current Trends in Logic-Based Inference Techniques"

    SAKAMA Chiaki, INOUE Katsumi, Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    人工知能学会誌 = Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence   25 ( 3 ) 366 - 367   2010.05

  • Answer Set Programming (in Japanese). Survey paper

    Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue

    Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence   25 ( 3 ) 368 - 378   2010

  • From Logic Programming to Answer Set Programming

    Katsumi Inoue, Chiaki Sakama

    Computer Software ( Japan Society for Software Science and Technology )  25 ( 3 ) 20 - 32   2008.07

     View Summary

    Horn logic programs on which Prolog is based have a restriction in the syntax of programs, where only definite knowledge can be represented. This limitation does not enable us to represent incomplete and indefinite knowledge in logic programs. To overcome this problem, several extended classes of logic programs have been proposed since late in the 1980s. Among them, answer set programming launched out into the new paradigm of logic programming in 1999, in which a logic program represents the constraints of a problem and its answer sets correspond to the solutions of the problem. Answer set programming has grown into one of the most popular research fields in logic programming. In this article, we review the essentials of answer set programming from the past to the future.

    DOI

  • Computing Preferred Answer Sets by means of Answer Set Programming

    WAKAKI Toshiko, INOUE Katsumi, SAKAMA Chiaki, NITTA Katsumi

    IEICE technical report. Artificial intelligence and knowledge-based processing ( The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers )  103 ( 103 ) 23 - 28   2003.05

     View Summary

    A framework of Prioritized logic programs (PLPs) is useful to represent explicit priorities between literals of logic programs. With its expressive power, PLPs theoretically enable us to realize various frameworks of nonmonotonic reasoning as well as preference abduction. However, so far, its implementation issues have scarcely been provided and even any sound procedure to compute preferred answer sets which give the semantics of PLPs, has not been proposed. In this paper, we present a procedure to compute all preferred answer sets of a PLP in answer set programming. We show soundness and completeness theorems for the procedure. Finally we show that our procedure makes PLPs not only practically available, but also have the capability of representing the dynamic preferences in addition to static ones.

  • 事例を用いたセルオートマトンのルール生成 (小特集:「Semantic Webとインテリジェントコンテンツ」および一般)

    前田 憲一, 坂間 千秋

    知識ベ-スシステム研究会 ( 人工知能学会 )  57   13 - 18   2002.09

  • アブダクションを使った帰納的学習について

    坂間 千秋

    人工知能基礎論研究会 ( 人工知能学会 )  ( 37 ) 57 - 60   1999.07

  • Studies on Disjunctive Logic Programming

    Chiaki Sakama (Part: Lead author )

    Dissertation, Kyoto University     1994

  • Foundations of Disjunctive Logic Programming/J.Lobo,J.Minker,A.Rajasekar(1992)

    Chiaki Sakama, Advanced Software Technology and Mechatronics Research Institute of Kyoto (ASTEM).

    コンピュ-タソフトウェア ( 日本ソフトウェア科学会 )  10 ( 5 ) p447 - 449   1993.09

  • Foundations of Disjunctive Logic Programming, J. Lobo, J. Minker, and A. Rajasekar, The MIT Press, 1992, 307 pages

    Sakama Chiaki (Part: Lead author )

    Computer Software ( Japan Society for Software Science and Technology )  10 ( 5 ) 5_447 - 5_449   1993

     View Summary

    <p></p>

    DOI

  • 非ホーン論理プログラム

    坂間 千秋

    人工知能学会誌 = Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence   6 ( 3 ) 443 - 444   1991.05

  • Partial Evaluation of Knowledgebase

    坂間 千秋, 森田 幸伯, 伊藤 英則

    全国大会講演論文集   33 ( 0 ) 1353 - 1354   1986.10

     View Summary

    知識ベースが大規模化されるにつれて,知識ベースシステムにおける問い合わせ処理の効率化が重要になってくる.知識ベースの構造化, 種々の探索戦略などはいずれも問い合わせ処理における検索の効率化を狙ったものである.プログラムにおける計算の効率化手法の一つに部分評価がある.これはプログラム中のある入力データを固定することによって繰り返し計算における効率向上を狙ったものであるが,以後ロジックプログラミング,演繹データベースなどの分野に応用されてきた.本稿では,Prologのようなホーン節で表現された知識ベースを想定する.そして,そのような知識ベースの部分評価の概念を導入し,問い合わせ処理の効率化手法として適用した場合の方法とその意義についで述べる.

▼display all

Awards & Honors

  • Best Paper Award

    Winner: Chiaki Sakama, Katsumi Inoue, Taisuke Sato

    2017.08   10th International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management   Linear Algebraic Characterization of Logic Programs

Research Exchange

  • 科研基盤Bの共同研究のため本学研究室に滞在

    2020.03
     

     International research exchanges

  • 科研基盤Aの共同研究のため本学研究室に滞在

    2018.01
    -
    2018.02
     

     International research exchanges

  • 平成29年度 国立情報学研究所共同研究

    2017.04
    -
    2018.03
     

     Joint research

  • 平成28年度 国立情報学研究所共同研究

    2016.04
    -
    2017.03
     

     Joint research

  • 平成24年度 国立情報学研究所共同研究

    2012.04
    -
    2013.03
     

     Joint research

  • 日本学術振興会(JSPS)平成24年度サマープログラムの一環で、米国ニューメキシコ州立大学博士課程在学中のBen Wright 氏を受け入れ、共同研究を行った。

    2012.04
    -
    2013.03
     

     International research exchanges

▼display all

KAKENHI

  • 知識表現・推論と機械学習の統合によるロバストAIの実現

    2021.04
    -
    2025.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(A)  Co-investigator

  • テンソル空間における巨大知識グラフのための高次推論技術の開発

    2018.04
    -
    2022.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(B)  Principal investigator

  • 状態遷移列からの関係ダイナミクス学習

    2017.04
    -
    2021.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(A)  Co-investigator

  • 論理プログラム表現に基づくセルオートマトン遷移規則学習

    2014.04
    -
    2016.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research  Co-investigator

  • 不誠実なエージェントに関する研究

    2012.04
    -
    2016.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)  Principal investigator

  • マルチエージェントシステムにおける社会知能の推論メカニズムに関する研究

    2008.04
    -
    2012.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)  Principal investigator

  • 推論による仮説発見とシステム生物学への応用

    2008.04
    -
    2012.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(A)  Co-investigator

  • 知的エージェント社会における社交的行動の計算論理に関する研究

    2005.04
    -
    2008.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)  Principal investigator

  • デフォルト知識を含む論理プログラムの順序化と帰納推論への応用に関する研究

    2003.04
    -
    2005.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)  Principal investigator

  • 先行投機的処理機能を持つマルチエージェントシステムの構築

    2001.04
    -
    2004.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(A)  Co-investigator

  • 非単調帰納倫理プログラミングにおける逆伴意法に関する研究

    2000.04
    -
    2002.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C)  Principal investigator

  • 不完全通信環境下における論理型マルチエージェントシステムの構築

    1999.04
    -
    2001.03
     

    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(B)  Co-investigator

  • アブダクションを使った帰納的学習に関する研究

    1998.04
    -
    2000.03
     

    奨励研究(A)  Principal investigator

▼display all

Public Funding (other government agencies of their auxiliary organs, local governments, etc.)

  • エージェント間交渉の帰納推論による定式化

    2008.04
    -
    2010.03
     

    Principal investigator

  • 知的エージェントの計算論理に関する研究

    2005.04
    -
    2008.03
     

    Principal investigator

Instructor for open lecture, peer review for academic journal, media appearances, etc.

  • 博士論文審査委員

    2022.07.14

    国立大学法人総合研究大学院大学

     View Details

    「学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員」以外の委員

    本学の複合科学研究科情報学専攻の学生の博士号取得にかかる博士論文審査を行う。

  • 客員教授

    2022.04.01
    -
    2023.03.31

    国立情報学研究所

     View Details

    客員教員(研究開発連携)

    情報学分野における大学等との連携体制を強化し情報学研究の一層の推進を図る。

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2022.01.01
    -
    2022.12.31

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 著書「深堀り!中学数学」(岩波ジュニア新書)

    2021.05.20
    -
    Now

    岩波書店

     View Details

    中学数学

    著書「深堀り!中学数学」(岩波ジュニア新書)の発行

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2021.01.01
    -
    2021.12.31

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 客員教授

    2020.04.01
    -
    2022.03.31

    大学共同利用機関法人情報・システム研究機構 国立情報学研究所

     View Details

    客員教員(研究開発連携)

    情報学分野における大学等との連携体制を強化し情報学研究の一層の推進を図る。

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2020.03

    NII

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Tuan Nguyen

  • 第38回ライフサイエンス懇話会

    2020.02

    和歌山県医師会

     View Details

    公開講座・講演会の企画・講師等

    ライフサイエンス懇話会にて人工知能に関する討論を行った,日付:2/2

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2020.01.01
    -
    2020.12.31

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2019.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 和歌山大学学部開放授業

    2019.04

    不明

     View Details

    公開講座・講演会の企画・講師等

    教養科目「論理的思考」を学部開放授業として行った。

  • 和歌山大学教育学部附属小1年生校外学習

    2019.03

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    和歌山大学教育学部附属小1年生(約100名)の校外学習(和歌山大学見学)のアシストを行った。,日付:3/7

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2018.12

    Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Tuấn Nguyễn

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2018.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 和歌山大学学部開放授業

    2018.04

    不明

     View Details

    公開講座・講演会の企画・講師等

    教養科目「論理的思考」を学部開放授業として行った。

  • 和歌山大学教育学部附属小1年生校外学習

    2018.03

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    和歌山大学教育学部附属小1年生(98名)の校外学習(和歌山大学見学)のアシストを行った。,日付:3/2

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2018.01

    University of Informatics Technology, VNU-HCM, Vietnam

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Hien D. Nguyen

  • 和歌山大学教育学部附属小2年生校外学習

    2017.09

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    和歌山大学教育学部附属小2年生(104名)の校外学習(和歌山大学見学)のアシストを行った。,日付:9/28

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2017.09

    Vienna University of Technology, Imperial College London

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名: Tobias Kaminski, Benjamin Wu

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2017.09

    University of Luxembourg

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Prof. Leon van der Torre

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2017.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 和歌山大学オープン・ラボ「公開体験学習会」

    2016.11

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    和歌山大学オープン・ラボ「公開体験学習会」で、一般参加者を対象とした人工知能関係のイベント企画を行った

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2016.09

    NII

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Dr. Sophie Tourret

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2016.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2015.11

    Universita degli Studi di Ferrara, Italy

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Prof. Evelina Lamma

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2015.06

    (1) Ecole Centrale de Nantes, France, (2) CSIC-UPC, Spain, (3) NII, Japan

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:(1) Dr. Morgan Magnin, (2) Dr. David Martinez, (3) Tony Ribeiro

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2015.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2015.04

    University of Luxembourg

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Prof. Leon van der Torre, Dr. Tjitze Rienstra

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2014.12

    (1) Ecole Centrale de Nantes, France, (2) Imperial College London, (3) NII/TRIC, (4) NII

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:(1) Dr. Morgan Magnin, (2) Dr. Andrew Cropper, (3) Dr. Nicolas Schwind, (4) Tony Ribeiro

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

    2014.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件以上

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2013.12

    (1) RWTH Aachen Univ., Germany, (2) Universite Paris-Dauphinem, France, (3) Ph.D student, NII, Japan

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:(1) Dr. Marcus Volker, (2) Dr. Gauvain Bourgne, (3) Tony Ribeiro

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2013.10

    Dr. Martin Caminada (University of Aberdeen, UK)

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Martin Caminada

  • Editorial board member

    2013.07
    -
    Now

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    Editorial board member

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2013.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 国際ワークショップLNMR2013のPost-Proceedingsの編集・発行

    2013.04
    -
    2014.03

    Computing Research Repository (CoRR)

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際ワークショップLNMR2013のPost-Proceedingsの編集・発行

  • 和歌山大学附属小学校一年生課外授業

    2013.02

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    ロボットに関するレクチャーと研究室によるデモを行った。,日付:2013.2

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2012.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • Advisory Board

    2012.04
    -
    Now

    STUDIES IN APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND RATIONAL ETHICS (Springer)

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    Advisory Board

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2012.04
    -
    2013.03

    NII, Japan

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Tony Ribeiro

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2012.04
    -
    2013.03

    米国、ニューメキシコ州立大学

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Ben Wright

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2011.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 国際会議DALT2011のPost-Proceedingsの編集

    2011.04
    -
    2013.03

    Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol.7169

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議DALT2011のPost-Proceedingsの編集

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2011.04
    -
    2012.03

    NII, Japan

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Dr Lena Wiese

  • Vol.25,No.3「論理に基づく推論技術の動向」ゲストエディタ

    2010.04
    -
    Now

    人工知能学会誌

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    Vol.25,No.3「論理に基づく推論技術の動向」ゲストエディタ

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2010.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2009.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 戦略的国際科学技術協力推進事業 

    2009.04
    -
    2010.03

    科学技術振興機構(JST)

     View Details

    国際交流事業

    日仏研究交流「システム生物学における仮説発見に関する研究」(代表、井上克巳 国立情報学研究所教授)の日本側研究メンバとして参加した。,相手国:フランス

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2009.04
    -
    2010.03

    Imperial College London, UK

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Dr Oliver Ray

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2008.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 戦略的国際科学技術協力推進事業 

    2008.04
    -
    2009.03

    科学技術振興機構(JST)

     View Details

    国際交流事業

    日仏研究交流「システム生物学における仮説発見に関する研究」(代表、井上克巳 国立情報学研究所教授)の日本側研究メンバとして参加した。,相手国:フランス

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2008.04
    -
    2009.03

    米国、ニューメキシコ州立大学; Universite Paris-Dauphinem, France

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Prof. Tran Cao Son; Dr. Gauvain Bourgne

  • 向陽大学ゼミナール

    2007.11

    その他

     View Details

    小・中・高校生を対象とした学部体験入学・出張講座等

    向陽高校で「大学と工学部で何を学ぶか?」というテーマで講演を行った。,日付:2007.11

  • 国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

    2007.04
    -
    Now

    その他

     View Details

    学術雑誌等の編集委員・査読・審査員等

    国際会議、国際ジャーナル、国内誌の論文査読20件前後

  • 戦略的国際科学技術協力推進事業 

    2007.04
    -
    2008.03

    科学技術振興機構(JST)

     View Details

    国際交流事業

    日仏研究交流「システム生物学における仮説発見に関する研究」(代表、井上克巳 国立情報学研究所教授)の日本側研究メンバとして参加した。,相手国:フランス

  • 外国人研究者等の受入

    2007.04
    -
    2008.03

    Utrechet University, Netherlands; University of Bristol, UK; University of Bath, UK

     View Details

    外国人研究者等の受入

    外国人研究者等の受入,氏名:Dr Martin Caminada, Dr. Oliver Ray, Martin Brain

▼display all

Committee member history in academic associations, government agencies, municipalities, etc.

  • プログラム委員

    2022.01
    -
    2022.12
     

    国際会議(8件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2021年に開催された5件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,

  • 客員教授

    2021.04
    -
    2022.03
     

    情報・システム研究機構

     View Details

    国や地方自治体、他大学・研究機関等での委員

    客員教員,任期:2019年5月~2021年3月

  • プログラム委員

    2021.01
    -
    2021.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2021年に開催された5件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,

  • プログラム委員

    2020.01
    -
    2020.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2020年に開催された5件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,

  • 客員教員

    2019.04
    -
    2021.03
     

    情報・システム研究機構

     View Details

    国や地方自治体、他大学・研究機関等での委員

    客員教員,任期:2019年5月~2021年3月

  • プログラム委員

    2019.01
    -
    2019.12
     

    国際会議(8件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2019年に開催された8件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2019.1~2019.12

  • プログラム委員

    2018.01
    -
    2018.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2018年に開催された5件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2018.1~2018.12

  • 申請書に基づく書面審査

    2017.06
     

    和歌山県産業技術政策課「先駆的産業技術研究開発支援事業」審査委員

     View Details

    国や地方自治体、他大学・研究機関等での委員

    申請書に基づく書面審査

  • 客員教員

    2017.05
    -
    2018.03
     

    情報・システム研究機構

     View Details

    国や地方自治体、他大学・研究機関等での委員

    客員教員,任期:2017年5月~2018年3月

  • プログラム委員

    2017.01
    -
    2017.12
     

    国際会議(8件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2017年に開催された8件の国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2017.1~2017.12

  • 申請書に基づく書面審査

    2016.08
     

    和歌山県産業技術政策課「先駆的産業技術研究開発支援事業」審査委員

     View Details

    国や地方自治体、他大学・研究機関等での委員

    申請書に基づく書面審査

  • プログラム委員

    2016.01
    -
    2016.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2016年に開催された5つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2016.1~2016.12

  • プログラム委員

    2015.01
    -
    2015.12
     

    国際会議(9件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2015年に開催された9つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2015.1~2015.12

  • プログラム委員

    2014.01
    -
    2014.12
     

    国際会議(7件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2014年に開催された7つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2014.1~2014.12

  • プログラム委員

    2013.01
    -
    2013.12
     

    国際会議(9件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2013年に開催された9つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2013.1~2013.12

  • プログラム委員

    2012.04
    -
    2012.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2012年度に開催された5つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2012.4~2012.12

  • 組織委員

    2011.05
    -
    2011.12
     

    9th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2011年に台湾で開催された国際ワークショップ(DALT)の組織委員を勤めた,任期:2011.4~2011.12

  • プログラム委員

    2011.04
    -
    2011.12
     

    国際会議(6件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2011年度に開催された6つの国際会議のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2011.4~2011.12

  • プログラム委員

    2010.04
    -
    2010.12
     

    国際会議(5件)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2010年度に開催された5つの国際会議(CLIMA, DALT, ILP, JELIA, NonMon@30)のプログラム委員を勤めた,任期:2010.4~2010.12

  • プログラム委員

    2009.04
    -
    2009.12
     

    Computational logic in multiagent systems (CLIMA)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2009年度に開催された国際会議(CLIMA)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2009.4~2009.12

  • プログラム委員

    2009.04
    -
    2009.12
     

    Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2009年度に開催された国際会議(DALT)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2009.4~2009.12

  • プログラム委員

    2009.04
    -
    2009.12
     

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2009年度に開催された国際会議(IJCAI)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2009.4~2009.12

  • プログラム委員

    2009.04
    -
    2009.12
     

    Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2009年度に開催された国際会議(LPNMR)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2009.4~2009.12

  • プログラム委員

    2008.04
    -
    2008.12
     

    Computational logic in multiagent systems (CLIMA)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2008年度に開催された国際会議(CLIMA)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2008.4~2008.12

  • プログラム委員

    2008.04
    -
    2008.12
     

    Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2008年度に開催された国際会議(LOPSTR)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2008.4~2008.12

  • プログラム委員

    2008.04
    -
    2008.12
     

    Nonmonotonic Reasoning (NMR)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2008年度に開催された国際会議(NMR)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2008.4~2008.12

  • プログラム委員

    2008.04
    -
    2008.12
     

    Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2008年度に開催された国際会議(DALT)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2008.4~2008.12

  • プログラム委員

    2007.04
    -
    2007.12
     

    Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2007年度に開催された国際会議(DALT)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2007.4~2007.12

  • プログラム委員

    2007.04
    -
    2007.12
     

    Abduction and Induction in AI (AIAI)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2007年度に開催された国際会議(AIAI)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2007.4~2007.12

  • プログラム委員

    2007.04
    -
    2007.12
     

    Computational logic in multiagent systems (CLIMA)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2007年度に開催された国際会議(CLIMA)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2007.4~2007.12

  • プログラム委員

    2007.04
    -
    2007.12
     

    Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR)

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2007年度に開催された国際会議(LPNMR)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2007.4~2007.12

  • プログラム委員

    2006.04
     

    国際会議

     View Details

    学協会、政府、自治体等の公的委員

    2006年度に開催された5つの国際会議(CLIMA, ECAI, NMR, AIAI, DALT)のプログラム委員を勤めた。,任期:2006.4~2006.4

▼display all

Other Social Activities

  • 民間企業からの受託研究

    2020.04
    -
    2021.03

    その他

     View Details

    産業界、行政諸機関等と行った共同研究、新技術創出、コンサルティング等

    株式会社エスティーワールドからの依頼により、航空券の需要予測に関する受託研究を行った

  • 民間企業からの受託研究

    2019.04
    -
    2020.03

    その他

     View Details

    産業界、行政諸機関等と行った共同研究、新技術創出、コンサルティング等

    株式会社エスティーワールドからの依頼により、航空券の需要予測に関する受託研究を行った

  • 民間企業からの受託研究

    2018.04
    -
    2019.03

    その他

     View Details

    産業界、行政諸機関等と行った共同研究、新技術創出、コンサルティング等

    株式会社エスティーワールドからの依頼により、航空券の需要予測に関する受託研究を行った

  • システム工学部同窓会近況報告会参加

    2016.04
    -
    2017.03

    その他

     View Details

    社会との連携を推進する活動

    システム工学部同窓会近況報告会に参加した

  • 工学研究合同シーズ発表会での研究発表

    2016.04
    -
    2017.03

    その他

     View Details

    産業界、行政諸機関等と行った共同研究、新技術創出、コンサルティング等

    大阪府立大学との工学研究合同シーズ発表会で研究発表を行った

  • 学部創立20周年記念式典・祝賀会

    2015.10

    その他

     View Details

    社会との連携を推進する活動

    学部創立20周年記念式典・祝賀会に参加

  • システム工学部同窓会近況報告会

    2014.10

    その他

     View Details

    社会との連携を推進する活動

    システム工学部同窓会近況報告会に参加

  • システム工学部同窓会近況報告会

    2013.10

    その他

     View Details

    社会との連携を推進する活動

    システム工学部同窓会近況報告会に参加

▼display all